Legal Opinion

Sprister v. City of Sturgis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1928No. Docket No. 104PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The first action 4s quo warranto to test the validity of amendments of the charter of the city of Sturgis. On motion the proceeding, after full hearing and taking the testimony, was dismissed and plaintiff brings error.

The city has a charter adopted under the home-rule act, 1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 3304 et seq., as amended. It has a city commission of five members elected at large, one elected each year for a term of five years. The main feature or purpose of the amendments adopted by the people at an election was to abolish such body and to provide for a commission of nine members, one to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Long v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Youells v. MorrishMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kelly v. LaingMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Attorney General v. GuyMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Aguirre v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Cicotte v. DamronMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API