Legal Opinion

Youells v. Morrish

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1922No. Docket No. 74PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Genesee; Brennan (Fred W.), J. Quo warranto by Harry Youells against Vern Morrish and others to determine the validity of defendants’ election as school trustees. Judgment dismissing the writ. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, C. J.

Plaintiff by this proceeding in the nature of quoi warranto seeks to have determined the validity of an election held on July 14, 1921, and purporting to be held under the provisions of Act No. 226, Pub. Acts 1917, as amended, and by which election the rural agricultural district of Swartz Creek, made up of five districts in Genesee county, was established. Defendants are the trustees of said school district. Plaintiff does not claim to be entitled to such office. He does not allege in his petition that he is a taxpayer or resident of the district, although no point seems to be made of this…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Finlayson v. Township of West BloomfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wills v. Iron County Board of CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Lake v. Township of North BranchMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Heidelmeyer v. Village of OakwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Sprister v. City of SturgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API