Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Guy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1952No. Docket 45, Calendar 45,413PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzbl, J.

Frank G. Millard, attorney general of the State of Michigan, plaintiff, brings original quo warranto proceedings in this Court to determine the right of Ralph B. Guy, defendant, to' the occupation of the office of municipal judge in the city of Dear-born, Wayne county. The following facts are conceded. The city of Dearborn has been organized under the home-rule act (PA 1909, No 279, as amended [CL 1948, § 117.1 et seq. (Stat Ann 1949 Rev § 5.2071 et seq.) ]) since January 9,1929. A new charter was adopted for the city in 1942. Chapter 10 thereof created the judicial department of the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Streat v. VermilyaMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Sprister v. City of SturgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lewicki v. MatulewiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People ex rel. Brown v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. In Re Removal of ThaxtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hall v. StricklandSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  4. Morrison v. City of East LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. City of Berkley v. HolmesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API