Legal Opinion

Cicotte v. Damron

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1956No. Docket 76, Calendar 46,458PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff filed an information in the nature of quo warranto in the circuit court for Wayne county to test the right of the defendant to hold the office of “inspector” in the police department of the city of Ecorse in said county. The circuit judge who heard the matter, after taking much testimony, entered an order ousting the defendant from the office of “assistant chief” of said police department and the defendant appeals.

In the information filed and in the order of ouster entered the office in question is referred to as being second in “rank” or “command” in said department.

On January 14,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bischoff v. County of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Attorney General v. GuyMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Mapley v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Sprister v. City of SturgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Royal v. Ecorse Police & Fire CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Continental Oil Co. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Craig v. City of Detroit Police DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Winn v. JordanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
  5. Kortering v. MuskegonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API