Legal Opinion

Forsyth v. Pendleton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1980No. 16695PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for specific performance of a uniform real estate contract between plaintiff-buyer and defendant-seller. Upon trial to the court, an order and judgment was entered which required delivery of the deed to the subject property to plaintiff. From that result, defendant appeals.

Plaintiff entered into a Uniform Real Estate Contract with Frances Pendleton, now deceased and whose estate is defendant herein, for the purchase of certain real property on March 24, 1971, for the sum of $9,000. Plaintiff paid $3,000 down and was to pay the remaining balance at the rate of $75 per month…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Del Porto v. NicoloUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Timpanogos Highlands, Inc. v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Wallace v. Build, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Skerl v. Willow Creek Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Hansen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co. v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. City Electric v. Dean Evans Chrysler-PlymouthUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Adair v. BrackenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. Eldridge v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. Anderson v. BrinkerhoffCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API