Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Brinkerhoff

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 9, 1988No. 880122-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Respondents initiated this action to quiet title in real property and for specific performance of a contract. The trial court found in favor of respondents and specifically enforced the contract, allowed respondents to make up past-due payments, and voided certain instruments signed by Elsie Brinkerhoff. Appellants contend the court committed reversible error in sua sponte finding Elsie incompetent, and thereafter in failing to appoint a guardian ad litem, but instead continuing the trial. Appellants ask this court to reverse the trial court and find the 1966 contract…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashton v. AshtonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. Eric Wesley ValenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. Pitcher v. LauritzenUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bradbury v. RasmussenUtah Supreme Court · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allen v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lunt v. LanceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  3. Wittingham v. TNE Limited PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Beckstead v. Deseret Roofing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  5. Maak v. IHC Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API