Legal Opinion
Town of South Windsor v. South Windsor Police Union Local 1480
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 1, 2001No. SC 16338PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
Within the past year, this court has had three occasions to elaborate on and apply the “public policy exception to the general rule of deference to an arbitrator’s award made pursuant to an unrestricted submission [to arbitration].” Groton v. United Steelworkers of America, 254 Conn. 35, 43, 757 A.2d 501 (2000); State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 387, AFL-CIO, 252 Conn. 467, 474-75, 747 A.2d 480 (2000); Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C., 252 Conn. 416, 427-28, 747 A.2d 1017 (2000). This certified appeal presents us with a fourth such occasion.
Following…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Medvalusa Health Programs, Inc. v. Memberworks, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Fish v. FishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. New England Health Care Employees UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.