Legal Opinion

State v. Withers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1993No. 9227SC547PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred by (1) admitting hearsay testimony by the State’s witness, Rita Jones; (2) excluding a tape recording offered by defendant to impeach Ms. Jones’ testimony; (3) denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the charges of the possession of stolen weapons at the close of all the evidence, and (4) denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict. For the reasons stated below, we find no prejudicial error.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error by allowing State’s witness, Rita…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. TriplettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Pauline Nadege Binam v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
  5. State v. RuffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API