Legal Opinion

Reed-Custer Community Unit School District No. 255-U v. City of Wilmington

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 19, 1994No. 3-92-0580PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

The City of Wilmington (City) adopted ordinances establishing a tax increment finance (TIE) district. Plaintiffs, various local taxing districts, brought suit challenging the validity of the ordinances. Thereafter, the circuit court declared the ordinances void and permanently enjoined the City from further implementing the TIF project and plan. The City brought this appeal. We affirm.

The primary issue on appeal involves the status of the subject land, i.e., whether the land is “vacant” and therefore eligible for assistance under the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (Ill. Rev. Stat.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People Ex Rel. City of Canton v. CrouchIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Walter Myers v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company, an Insurance Company Doing Business in IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Schuermann v. Dwelling House InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Cavin v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henry County Board v. Village of OrionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Board of Education, Pleasantdale School District No. 107 v. Village of Burr RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Geisler v. City of Wood RiverAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. City of Chicago v. Boulevard Bank National Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Board of Education of Community High School District No. 218 v. Village of RobbinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API