Legal Opinion

Geisler v. City of Wood River

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 3, 2008No. 5-07-0142 RelPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Spomer

The plaintiffs, Randy Geisler, Michael Van Winkle, and Stacey M. Curtis, appeal the order of the circuit court of Madison County that entered a judgment in favor of the defendants, the City of Wood River, Illinois (the City), and Wood River Partners, LLC (the developer), on the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint (the complaint). The plaintiffs raise numerous issues on appeal, which we restate as follows: whether the circuit court erred when it determined that (1) the City complied with the procedural requirements set forth in the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (the TIE Act) —…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In re E.H., a MinorIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Western National Bank v. Village of KildeerIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Murray v. Chicago Youth CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. HamptonIllinois Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hot Light Brands, L.L.C. v. Harris Realty, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Board of Education of Richland School District No. 88A v. City of Crest HillIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Malec v. City of Belleville, IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Capital Fitness of Arlington Heights, Inc. v. Village of Arlington HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Vaughn v. BartonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API