Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Speier
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 1943No. Civ. 6802PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This is an appeal by defendants Leo Lippow and the Palace Hotel, a partnership, from a judgment rendered against them and in favor of the plaintiff and respondent L. D. Wallace, in the sum of $7,616.50. The personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff were found by the trial court to have been the result of the defendants’ negligence in failing to keep a shower in one of their hotel rooms in reasonable repair.
At the first trial the jury failed to agree. At the conclusion of the second trial, which was before the court alone, the defendants moved for a nonsuit and a dismissal of the complaint…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Silveira v. IversenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Robertson v. WeingartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Korsak v. Atlas Hotels, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Burch v. Valley Motor Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Conolley v. BullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.