Legal Opinion
Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City of Springboro
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 20, 2007No. 06-3284PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc., Mark Harrington, Quentin Patch, and Dale Henkel, appeal from the district court’s grunt of summary judgment to Defendants on their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Defendants 1 violated their constitutional rights under the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and conspired to violate those rights. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc.…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Proctor v. ApplegateDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- A.C. Ex Rel. J.C. v. Shelby County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Logsdon v. HainsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Ghaster v. City of Rocky RiverDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Cressman v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.