Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Cobb

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 2006No. 1261 MDA 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Douglas Simmons, appeals from the judgment entered in the York County Court of Common Pleas following the denial of his post-trial motions. Specifically, Appellant, the plaintiff below, asks us to determine whether the trial court improperly denied his pretrial request to introduce evidence that he was receiving social security disability (“SSD”) benefits. The trial court determined that Appellant could not present such evidence due to the “collateral source rule.” Following careful review, we conclude that the “collateral source rule” was not applicable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Carrozza v. GreenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Collins v. Cement Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. In re Petition to Remove Constable VisoskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. ChatwaniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Nazarak, S. v. Waite, R., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Pusl v. MeansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Nazarak, S. v. Waite, R., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Balliet v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API