Legal Opinion

In re Petition to Remove Constable Visoski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCaffery, j.

¶ 1 In this appeal, we have been asked by the Commonwealth to decide whether the trial court properly denied its Petition to Remove Constable, filed pursuant to 13 P.S. § 31. Specifically, we must determine whether the trial court was empowered by the statute to review conduct committed while Appellee was acting in his capacity as Chief of the Lackawanna Valley Railway Police. Under the circumstances of this case, we hold that Appellee was not acting in his official capacity as Constable at the time of the offensive conduct. Accordingly, we affirm.

¶ 2 The relevant facts and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blumenstock v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. RM v. Baxter Ex Rel. TMSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. DolnySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. SpanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Malone v. StonerookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simmons v. CobbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. In Re Petition for Appointment of Constable PenderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Com. of PA ex rel. A.J. Watson, DA v. K.N. CrosbyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. In Re Petition for Appointment of Constable PenderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. In Re: Biletnikoff, M., Appeal of: Biletnikoff, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API