Legal Opinion

Clark v. Carter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 28, 1922No. 11844PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Action by George F. Clark, member of the State Board of Public Affairs, against Prank C. Carter, as State Auditor, for a writ of mandamus to compel said Prank 0. Carter, as auditor, to allow a claim of said George P. Clark and to issue warrant therefor for traveling expenses incurred by said George P. Clark in the discharge of his duties as a member of the State Board of Affairs.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

This was an action in the district court of Oklahoma county by George P. 'Clark, a member of the State Board of Public Affairs, -against Prank C. Canter, as State Auditor, for a writ of mandamus to compel said Prank C. Carter, - as auditor, to allow a claim of said George F. Clark and to issue warrant therefor for traveling expenses incurred by said George P. Clark in the discharge of his duties as a member of the State Board of Public Affairs. Upon the hearing the trial court denied the writ, and claimant, George P. Clark, has appealed from the order of denial to this court.

These questions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Tulsa v. PurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Independent School District No. 1 of Oklahoma County v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Butler v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Hartley Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Ace Flying Service, Inc. v. Colorado Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Ace Flying Service, Inc. v. Colorado Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API