Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Hartley Bros.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Judgment) 'below was in the ■sum of $1,750 and interest, based on loss of 92 head of cattle occasioned by the carelessness and negligence of the appellant carrier in handling said cattle while in transit from Little Rock, Ark., to Delaware, Okla.
The defendant denied generally and relied upon a defense that not its carelessness and negligence in handling in transit of the cattle caused the damage, but that it was caused by the poor and weakened condition of the cattle and by the dipping of them prior to transportation. The jury determined this issue in favor of plaintiff, and there is evidence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barrett v. Van PeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RundellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Davis v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Hartley Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933