Legal Opinion

Sanford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2011No. WD 72291PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge.

This is a Rule 24.035 case. The movant timely filed her pro se motion, which the motion court denied. However, the court never appointed counsel to file an amended motion or otherwise comply with Rule 24.035(e) and (g), even though it is undisputed that the movant is indigent. The court clearly erred in not appointing counsel, and the State concedes that the judgment should be reversed. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand with instructions to appoint counsel.

Facts and Procedural Background

Appellant Danielle Sanford pled guilty to two counts of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Jodi Whitfield, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Scott M. Bishop v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Haynes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State ex rel. Volner v. StorieMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API