Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 12, 2002No. SC 84599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.1

David L. Bennett pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree statutory rape and one count of incest. He was sentenced to imprisonment. He then filed this action pursuant to Rule 24.035. His attached in forma pauperis affidavit contained an incomplete indication of indigen-cy. The motion court denied relief without appointing counsel. Because counsel should have been appointed, the judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded.

Bennett’s Rule 24.035 motion was filed pro se on the prescribed form. Question 18 on the form asks whether the movant has completed the sworn affidavit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Arata v. Monsanto Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. Bullard v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Creighton v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. Sean A. Price v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Vincent U. Williams v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Sanford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Jodi Whitfield, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API