Legal Opinion

Jodi Whitfield, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 2014No. ED100345PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LISA S. VAN AMBURG, Presiding Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Jodi Whitfield appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying her pro se Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court refused to appoint counsel for Whitfield and did not conduct an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Whitfield argues that the motion court erred by denying her motion without appointing counsel, because Rule 24.035(e) requires the court to appoint counsel when an indigent movant files a pro se motion for post-conviction relief. The State agrees with Whitfield.

We reverse the motion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Swallow v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKay v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. Jason L. Eckes v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Stacey I.M. Morehead v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State of Missouri v. Billy Joe BellamyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API