Legal Opinion

Town of Grimes v. Adel Clay Products Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1964No. 51144PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

— The question presented is purely one of fact. Is the evidence such that we can find as a fact that plaiu-tiff has made an affirmative showing it is capable of extending ■into the territory to be annexed substantial municipal services and benefits not theretofore enjoyed by such territory, so that the proposed annexation will not result merely in increasing the revenue of plaintiff from taxation? In pertinent part, section 362.26, subsection 6, Code of Iowa, 1958, is:

“6. If the court finds that there is an affirmative showing that the municipal corporation is capable of extending into such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Cedar Rapids v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. City of Des Moines v. LampartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. Town of Clive v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Town of Clive v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Town of Coralville v. Great Lakes Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Clinton v. Owners of the Property Situated Within Certain Described BoundariesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. City of Monticello v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. Town of Grimes v. Bd. of Adjustment, Polk Cty.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. City of Cedar Falls v. SieglaffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API