Legal Opinion

City of Cedar Falls v. Sieglaff

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 14, 1966No. 52158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

Forty-seven defendants owning 25 parcels of land with a total area of about 780 acres or 28.5 percent of the 4.3 square miles of unincorporated territory plaintiff City of Cedar Falls seeks to annex under section 362.26, Code, 1962, have appealed from the decree of annexation following trial in equity. The remaining defendants were in default.

The single proposition relied on for reversal is that plaintiff has wholly failed to show it is capable of extending into the affected territory substantial municipal services and benefits not theretofore enjoyed by such territory and the evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Cedar Rapids v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. City of Des Moines v. LampartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. Town of Clive v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Town of Clive v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Town of Coralville v. Great Lakes Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Clinton v. Owners of the Property Situated Within Certain Described BoundariesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. City of Bettendorf v. AbelnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Dickinson County v. City Development CommitteeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. City of Decorah v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. City of Altoona v. SandquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API