Legal Opinion
Boyles v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 5, 1979No. 18113PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
Thomas D. Thompson, plaintiff, sued W. M. Boyles and Ernestine Hyder, defendants, seeking to collect damages, either as money due and owing by contract for real estate broker’s commission or as damages for breach of contract and because of action of the defendants, as conspirators, which sought to deprive him of payment of the commission. As against Boyles there was also charged that he had tortiously interfered with Thompson’s contractual rights with Hyder.
Trial was to a jury, upon the verdict of which, coupled with findings by the court under the provisions of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clements v. WithersTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Leonard Duckworth, Inc., and Kofender, Snoddy & Associates v. Michael L. Field and Company, and Michael L. Field, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Bourland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Jernigan v. WainerTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Myers v. Arcadio, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Rite Aid Corp. v. Lake Shore InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.