Legal Opinion
ESTRADA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2013No. ID 3790PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 180
(BIA 2013) Interim Decision #3790 Matter of Charlemagne Micabalo ESTRADA, Respondent Matter of Vanessa Joan ESTRADA, Respondent Decided August 8, 2013 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A spouse or child accompanying or following to join a principal grandfathered alien cannot qualify as a derivative grandfathered alien for purposes of section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) (2006), by virtue of a spouse or child relationship that arose after April 30, 2001. FOR RESPONDENTS:…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Perry v. Commerce Loan Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- ARAIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1970
- RAJAHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
- Balam-Chuc v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Linares Huarcaya v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Agyei v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Romanyuk v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Bonifon v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- TRIANABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2022
- Angeles v. JohnsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.