Romanyuk v. Lynch
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*561MEMORANDUM
Tucker, Chief Judge.
Currently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 14-15.) Upon careful consideration of the parties’ submissions and responses and for the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED and Defendants’ Cross Motion is GRANTED. . ^ .
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plantiffs Oleksandr Romanyuk and Na-talya Silanteva bring this immigration .action against Defendants Attorney General of the United States, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), and Acting- District Director of USCIS:…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Yusupov v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Aladetohun O. Bamidele v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BAEZ MORFA v. BLINKENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- LOWER SALFORD TOWNSHIP AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025