Legal Opinion

Romanyuk v. Lynch

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-7062PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*561MEMORANDUM

Tucker, Chief Judge.

Currently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 14-15.) Upon careful consideration of the parties’ submissions and responses and for the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED and Defendants’ Cross Motion is GRANTED. . ^ .

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plantiffs Oleksandr Romanyuk and Na-talya Silanteva bring this immigration .action against Defendants Attorney General of the United States, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), and Acting- District Director of USCIS:…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Yusupov v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Aladetohun O. Bamidele v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BAEZ MORFA v. BLINKENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  2. LOWER SALFORD TOWNSHIP AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API