Legal Opinion

Angeles v. Johnson

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 4, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-00008-BTM-RBBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge.

Presently pending before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment in a matter arising under the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706. The challenged agency action is Defendant’s, United States Citizenship , and Immigration Services (“USGIS” or the “Agency”), denial of Plaintiffs’, Nataly and Alan Angeles, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, Form 1-485, as derivative beneficiaries of a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Judulang v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API