Legal Opinion
TRIANA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided December 1, 2022No. ID 4055 (PDF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
28 I&N Dec. 659
(BIA 2022) Interim Decision #4055 Matter of Policarpo TRIANA, Respondent Decided December 1, 2022 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals When determining whether a respondent is grandfathered for purposes of adjustment of status under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) (2018), a decision of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to approve a visa petition filed on or before April 30, 2001, does not foreclose an Immigration Judge from determining in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- BRIONESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- RAJAHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
- TIJAMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
- Linares Huarcaya v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- FURTADOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2024