Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 30, 2000No. 00SA298PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

We determine in this case that the proponents of an initiative may commence circulating their petition for signatures after the Title Board has taken its final action in regard to the ballot titles and summary, pursuant to section 1-40-107(1) and (5), 1 C.R.S. (2000), and while that action is before us on appeal pursuant to section 1-40-107(2), 1 C.R.S. (2000). 1 In light of our ruling affirming the Title Board's action, Secretary of State Donetta Davidson (Davidson), in making her determination of sufficiency, properly counted signatures obtained after the Title Board denied the rehearing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Title, Ballot Title 1997-98 No. 30Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Havens v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Steadman v. HindmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary for 1999-2000 227 and 228 v. HobbsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. In Re Ballot Title 1999-2000 No. 258 (A)Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Sec'y of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Percy v. FielderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. People v. HerreraColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Hayes v. OttkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. Cordero v. DoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API