Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ramsay

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 8, 2002No. 1990758 and 1000454PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court has granted two petitions for certiorari review of two respective judgments of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming two respective summary judgments entered by the trial court on distinct contract claims in the same civil action. We affirm.

The parties are the "Hospital,"1 its "Auxiliary,"2 and Dr. Steve Ramsay. An important entity, not a party, is the "Clinic,"3 which supplied physicians to the Hospital. The Hospital, its Auxiliary, and the Clinic, which at all pertinent times have cooperated with each other, are located in Grove Hill.

The Auxiliary sued Dr. Ramsay in contract for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Ex Parte RyalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. City of Birmingham v. Business Realty Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Al.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Regions Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Lyons v. River Road Constr., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. ALABAMA AGR. AND MECHANICAL UNIV. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Pavilion Development v. Jbj PartnershipSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Stewart v. BrinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API