Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ryals

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 3, 2000No. 1971679PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

773 So.2d 1011 (2000)

Ex parte David RYALS.

(Re David Ryals v. City of Montgomery and Gatewood Walden).

1971679.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 3, 2000.

J. Doyle Fuller and Susan G. Copeland, Montgomery, for petitioner.

Gatewood Walden, respondent, pro se.

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming a summary judgment entered in favor of the respondent on his claim for attorney fees to be deducted incrementally from future installments of Trinity Act benefits the respondent won for the petitioner when the respondent represented…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Dairyland Ins. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Ex Parte WigintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Bevill v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Teplick v. MoultonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. McNabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Turner v. Westhampton Court, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. McKenzie v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API