Waterman-Waterbury Co. v. School District No. 4
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Montcalm; Davis, J. Assumpsit by the Waterman-Waterbury Company against school district number 4 of Cato township, Montcalm county, for the contract price of a heating system. Judgment' for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiif brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
Plaintiif brought this action in the circuit court of Montcalm county, to recover the contract price of a heating and ventilating system which it installed in defendant’s schoolhouse during the fall of 1911. Upon the trial of said cause in the circuit court before a jury the court directed a verdict for defendant on the ground that plaintiif had mistaken its remedy. Plaintiff’s declaration was in assumpsit upon the common counts, with a special count upon a written contract alleged to have been entered into between the parties and set forth at length. Defendant pleaded the general issue, and,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Up River Ice Co. v. DenlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- Coffin v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- People ex rel. Reeder v. Treasurer of WexfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Waterman-Waterbury Co. v. School District No. 2Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cochrane v. ForbesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- McLeod v. State Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Miller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Hall v. Ira TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Hill v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.