Legal Opinion
Hill v. State Highway Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 1969No. Calendar 2, Docket 51,842PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
On March 7, 1967, plaintiffs filed a complaint with the Court of Appeals in which they sought an order to require defendant to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue directed to the State highway commission and commanding it to institute an action to ascertain and determine the damages to plaintiffs’ property as a result of establishment of the right-of-way and construction of the 1-94 expressway.
The complaint stated that plaintiffs were the owners of a lot in the city of St. Clair Shores located at the northwest corner of Edmunton drive and Mauer drive; that the lot had an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Thom v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Dearborn v. Michigan Turnpike AuthorityMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Waterman-Waterbury Co. v. School District No. 4Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wayside Church v. Van Buren CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Teasel v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. MarkelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Biff's Grills, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lim v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.