Legal Opinion

Faver v. Bayh

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1997No. 67A01-9607-CV-220PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Mark A. Faver and Rodney DeHart (“Prisoners”), inmates at the Indiana State Farm, 1 filed a complaint against Governor Evan Bayh, in his official capacity, and John Nunn, Christopher DeBruyn, Norman Owens, Bruce Jordan and Richard Zuel, in their individual and representative capacities (collectively “the State”), and alleged that inmates housed in the Protective Custody Unit (“PCU”) of the Indiana State Farm were treated differently from inmates in the general population in violation of the United States Constitution, the Indiana Constitution and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kimrey v. DonahueIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Carroll v. J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Natalie Medley v. Bruce Lemmon, Julie Stout, Pam Ferguson, Stacey Milner, Sherry White, L.A. Vannatta, Mike Pavese, Virginia McCulloughIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Cohn v. StrawhornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Golitko v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API