Legal Opinion

Kimrey v. Donahue

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 2007No. 48A02-0603-CV-261PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellants, William J. Kimrey and David S. Healey (“the Claimants”), challenge the trial court’s dismissal of their complaint against Appellees, J. David Donahue, the Indiana Department of Correction, Stanley Knight, and the Pendleton Correctional Facility (collectively “the IDOC”).

We affirm.

The Claimants are both inmates at the Department of Correction’s Pendleton Correctional Facility. On July 18, 2005, the Claimants filed a complaint alleging that the IDOC has in place an administrative procedure 1 which they contend violates their rights as set forth in Indiana Code…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blanck v. Ind. Dep't of Corr.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ratliff v. CohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Indiana Department of Correction v. StaggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hasty v. BroglinIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Americanos v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. John Doe 1 v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Alexander v. Marion County SheriffIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Natalie Medley v. Bruce Lemmon, Julie Stout, Pam Ferguson, Stacey Milner, Sherry White, L.A. Vannatta, Mike Pavese, Virginia McCulloughIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Chuck W. Adams, Charles E. Howard v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API