Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jones

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1984No. 2176PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act. 19 P.S. § 1180-1 et seq. (Since reenacted at 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9541 et seq.). We must quash the appeal.

Rule 2101, Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that briefs shall conform with the various appellate rules and if the briefs are substantially defective the reviewing court may quash the appeal. The courts of this Commonwealth have on numerous occasions invoked the punitive measures of Rule 2101. See Commonwealth v. Davis, 309 Pa.Superior Ct. 506, 455 A.2d 725 (1983);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Wicker v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. A.M. Skier Agency, Inc. v. Pocono Futures, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FelixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. SpuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. DrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. StoppieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API