Inagawa v. Fayette County
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hunstein, Chief Justice.
Jamie Inagawa, the Solicitor-General of Fayette County, filed a mandamus action against Fayette County and its Commissioners in their official capacities (collectively, “the County”), asserting that since July 1, 2007 his compensation has been incorrectly calculated. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to Inagawa and partial summary judgment to the County, and each party appeals. We conclude that the trial court correctly held that Inagawa was improperly compensated beginning in July 2007. We disagree, however, with the trial court’s conclusion that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Jesup v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Thompson v. TalmadgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Labovitz v. HopkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- City of Atlanta v. HudginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Bible v. BibleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Luangkhot v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. ZeaglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Clark v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- MAYS v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.