Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Talmadge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1947No. 15797, 15792, 15798, 15802PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) That the trial courts had jurisdiction .in each of these' cases to adjudicate all questions there raised that are collateral to the main question as to which of the contending parties is entitled, to perform the duties of Governor of this State can not be seriously questioned. But it is stoutly maintained by counsel for Mr. Talmadge that the courts were without jurisdiction to adjudicate the principal question as to whether or not Mr. Talmadge is the lawful Governor of this State. The grounds upon which this contention is…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Dickson v. StricklandTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People Ex Rel. Sherwood v. State Board of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Attorney-General ex rel. Bashford v. BarstowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Atlanta Independent School System v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Lathrop v. DealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API