City of Atlanta v. Hudgins
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Dúckworth, Justice.
In 1882 this court, in Collins v. Macon, 69 Ga. 542, held that for failure to perforin legislative or judicial acts a municipal corporation is not liable; but that for ministerial acts the rule is different, and that damages may be recovered either from the neglect to perform them, or from performing them in an unskillful, .negligent, or improper manner. The rule announced in that case is now codified as section 69-301. The Code, § 3-106, declares that “no demand shall be necessary to the commencement of an action, except in such cases as the law or the contract…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Crovatt v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DottenheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Mayes v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Stewart v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Crabb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Thompson v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Johnson v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Atlanta v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Franklin County v. Fieldale Farms Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Irwin v. TorbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.