Legal Opinion
United States v. Hardy
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided April 8, 1997No. 96-0356; Crim. App. No. 9401257PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
EFFRON, Judge:
In a contested general court-martial at Fort Hood, Texas, officer and enlisted members convicted appellant of forcible oral sodomy in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 925, but acquitted him of rape and attempted forcible anal sodomy.1 They sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 5 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved these results, and the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed without written opinion.
We granted review of the following issue:…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Myrtle D. Washington, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth of Virginia v. Rayshawn Torrell GreerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. RendonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. SanchezUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. LanierArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.