Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1959No. 41,054 and 41,162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jackson, J.:

These are two appeals from one case in the court below.

The proceeding in district court involved the settlement of the claims and mechanics’ liens growing out of the drilling of an oil well — an oil well which came in as a dry hole.

The well was begun by defendant Richard B. Schmidt, but he stopped his work and joined the armed forces before the well was completed. There were some eighteen other persons who owned interests in the well besides Schmidt. These “interest holders” completed drilling the well after Schmidt ceased work.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kerr v. ReeceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Lamme v. John Schilling & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Overlander v. OverlanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Kackley State Bank v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. O'Flanagan v. CaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arbogast v. ArbogastWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Shinkle v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Hood v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API