Legal Opinion
Speer v. Cimosz
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 1982No. 5245PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This appeal stems from a jury verdict against New Hampshire Insurance Group (New Hampshire), the workmen’s compensation carrier for the respective employers of defendants Cimosz and Marquez. The case against New Hampshire was submitted to the jury on two theories: breach of contract, and interference with contractual relations. In eight points, New Hampshire urges on appeal that it should have been granted a directed verdict because there was insufficient evidence to allow either theory of its alleged liability to go to the jury or to support the verdict; that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- M & M Rental Tools, Inc. v. Milchem, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Anderson v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Durrett v. PetritsisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Garcia v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Fikes v. FurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- AG New Mexico, FCS, ACA v. Borges (In re Borges)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.