Legal Opinion
Fikes v. Furst
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 2003No. 27824PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} Petitioner Peter Furst, Ph.D. petitioned this Court to review an opinion of the Court of Appeals that reinstated some of the claims brought against him by Respondent Jay Fikes, Ph.D., but otherwise affirmed the district court’s judgment for Dr. Furst. See Fikes v. Furst, 2003-NMCA-006, 133 N.M. 146, 61 P.3d 855. Dr. Fikes had brought this lawsuit against Dr. Furst in the district court for defamation, tortious interference with contract, and various other claims. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Dr. Furst on all claims in three separate…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Thompson v. Western States Medical CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Newberry v. Allied Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Newberry v. Allied Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Elane Photography, LLC v. WillockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SewellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Smith v. DurdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MoralesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Zarr v. Washington Tru Solutions, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.