Legal Opinion

Matter of Allred

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1996No. COA94-1160PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

Respondent first argues the trial court erred by admitting into evidence numerous court orders concerning her four older children. These orders reflect that all four children had been adjudicated to be neglected and give the facts surrounding the adjudications. Respondent never regained custody of these children. Respondent’s first husband gained custody of two of the children, one child was legally emancipated, and the fourth child died in a nursing home while in the custody of DSS. Respondent contends this evidence should have been excluded under N.C.R. Evid. 404(b). We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. In Re TysonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re NesbittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. In re J.L.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. In re Y.Y.E.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. In re T.D.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. In re A.L.G.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API