Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Lonnquist

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 14, 2009No. 62754-6-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

fl Where a fixed-term employment contract expires and the employee continues to render the same services provided under the previous agreement, a court will presume that the employee is serving under a new, implied contract having the same terms and conditions as contained in the expired contract. However, where it is clear that the implied contract does not have the same terms and conditions as the earlier agreement, there is no basis to presume that the contracting parties necessarily renewed any specific term of the prior agreement. Because the evidence in the record and the pleadings…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Verbeek Properties, LLC v. GreenCo Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Weiss v. LonnquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Weiss v. LonnquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Rimov v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Verbeek Properties v. Greenco EnvironCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API