Legal Opinion

Rimov v. Schultz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 20, 2011No. 64439-4-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

253 P.3d 462 (2011)

Amy RIMOV, a single woman, Respondent,

v.

Mary SCHULTZ, a single woman, and Mary Schultz and Associates P.S., aka Mary Schultz Law P.S., Appellant.

No. 64439-4-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

June 20, 2011.

Mary E. Schultz, Mary Schultz Law P.S., Spokane, WA, Philip A. Talmadge, Peter Lohnes, Talmadge/Fitzpatrick, Tukwila, WA, for Appellant.

Amy Rimov, Spokane, WA, Ross P. White, Matthew W. Daley, William M. Symmes, Witherspoon Kelley Davenport & Toole, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

APPELWICK, J.

¶ 1 Rimov filed a complaint for damages and an equitable distribution of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Top Line Builders, Inc. v. BovenkampCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. AMOS v. AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
  3. Richard Jensen And Jensen Enterprises, Inc., App v. John Misner, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Top Line Builders Inc., Resp/cross App v. Us Bank, App/cross RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API