Robert Roman v. Cessna Aircraft Company and the Boeing Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
Robert Roman brought this antitrust action under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 15 and state law, alleging that Cessna Aircraft Company and The Boeing Company conspired to restrain trade by agreeing not to hire each other’s engineers. The district court granted defendants’ motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, ruling that Mr. Roman lacked antitrust standing. Mr. Roman appeals and we reverse.
I
The complaint in this case alleges the following facts. Mr. Roman was “employed at Boeing as an airplane engineer via a contract with Butler Service Corporation.”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Carlos A. Quinonez v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Sharp v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by61 opinions
- Grossman v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Charles James Witt v. Roadway Express, Jim Kasperski, Teamsters Local No. 41, and Warren StevensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Dill v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Lori G. McKenzie v. Renberg's Inc., and Robert RenbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Summum v. CallaghanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.