Legal Opinion
Lori G. McKenzie v. Renberg's Inc., and Robert Renberg
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1996No. 94-5197PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Lori G. McKenzie brought this action against her former employer, Renberg’s Inc., and its president, Robert Renberg (collectively “defendants”), asserting claims for retaliatory discharge in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3), and wrongful discharge in violation of Oklahoma public policy. The district court dismissed McKenzie’s state law wrongful discharge claim prior to trial under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). McKenzie received a favorable jury verdict on her retaliation claim, but the district court thereafter entered…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Clement SUMNER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Medina v. City & County DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Littlejohn v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Richmond v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Conner v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.