Legal Opinion
Dill v. City of Edmond
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1998No. 97-6110, 97-6122PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Dennis Dill, a police officer employed by the City of Edmond, Oklahoma, brought suit against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated his First Amendment free speech and Fourteenth Amendment due process rights. Plaintiff also brought several pendent state law claims. The district court bifurcated this case for trial because Plaintiffs failed to make a timely jury demand for his claims against Defendants Terry Gregg, Bill Vetter and the City of Edmond. The claims against Defendants Ben Daves and David Preston were tried before…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Schrier v. University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Currier v. DoranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Calderon v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Morris v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Lippoldt v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.