Wackenhut Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
WALD, Circuit Judge:
The Wackenhut Corporation (“Wacken-hut”), a company which provides security guard services, argues that a union of 11 guards 1 employed by Wackenhut was improperly certified because it is impermissi-bly affiliated with a union that has non-guard members, in violation of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 159(b)(3) (“the Act”). The National Labor Relations Board (“Board” or “NLRB”) rejected this argument. We find that although the challenged unit of guards was undoubtedly reliant on a member of a non-guard union…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Wackenhut Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999