Legal Opinion
Didriksen v. Havens
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 16, 1949PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiffs seek specific performance of an option to purchase certain premises occupied by them in Darien, and judgment was rendered in their favor. The defendants appeal on the principal ground that the subordinate facts do not support the conclusions reached. They also assign as error certain rulings on evidence. The facts found are not disputed, and those which the defendants seek to add are included in the following statement.
The plaintiff has been engaged for some time as construction engineer for the American Can Company. His duties require him to supervise many of that company’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thompson v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Pettit v. TourisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Boucher v. GodfreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Carrano v. ShoorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- City Coal Co. v. MarcusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Peter-Michael, Inc. v. Sea Shell AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Hess v. Dumouchel Paper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Foard v. SniderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.