Mendenhall v. Stovall
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
Although no motion is made in this court to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the bill of exceptions is premature, we believe that question is close enough to warrant consideration by the court to determine our jurisdiction. The general rule is that no cause shall be carried to this court upon any bill of exceptions while the same is pending in the court below, unless the decision or judgment complained of, if it had been rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error, would have been a final disposition of the cause or final as to some material party thereto.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moody v. Muscogee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Mohr-Weil Lumber Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Eckford v. Borough of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Hamilton v. DuPreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Capital City Tobacco Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Georgia Veneer & Package Co. v. Florida National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Ewing v. First Nat. Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Milholland v. OglesbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- City of Cedartown v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Levine v. LevineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.